Markovich v. TransUnion, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Aryeh Markovich
Defendant: TransUnion, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and Hyundai Capital America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv03065
Filed: May 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Steven I Locke
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2022 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aryeh Markovich. Hyundai Capital America, Inc. served on 6/20/2022, answer due 7/11/2022. (Saland, Tamir)
July 22, 2022 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aryeh Markovich. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 6/20/2022, answer due 8/8/2022. (Saland, Tamir)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order Dismissing Parties: The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the above defendant(s). - Party TransUnion, LLC terminated. So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 7/8/2022. (Cubano, Jazmin)
July 7, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement as to TransUnion LLC by Aryeh Markovich (Saland, Tamir)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Electronic ORDER granting DE #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. On consent, the deadline for Defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to and including 8/26/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 7/6/2022. (Pincsak, Lydia)
July 5, 2022 Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation. (Amore, Dennis)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Electronic ORDER granting DE #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Without opposition, the deadline for Defendant Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to and including 8/8/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 7/1/2022. (Pincsak, Lydia)
June 30, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for Defendant Experian by Aryeh Markovich. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Saland, Tamir)
June 29, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aryeh Markovich. TransUnion, LLC served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Saland, Tamir)
June 29, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aryeh Markovich. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Saland, Tamir)
June 29, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aryeh Markovich. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Saland, Tamir)
May 31, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Hyundai Capital America, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, TransUnion, LLC. (Cubano, Jazmin)
May 27, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Aryeh Markovich (Saland, Tamir)
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Aryeh Markovich (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Experian, #2 Proposed Summons Hyundai, #3 Proposed Summons Nissan, #4 Proposed Summons Transunion) (Saland, Tamir)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: To assist the Court in its review of standing in this action, which appears to allege procedural violations of the FCRA, plaintiff is directed to respond via letter filed on ECF within 5 days of the date of this order, as follows: 1. Does plaintiff claim any concrete, particularized injury in fact from the statutory violations alleged herein? If so, please set forth such injury/injuries with particularity. 2. If plaintiff is not claiming any such concrete injury, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Transunion LLC v. Ramirez, Slip Op. No. 20-297, 2021 WL 2599472 (U.S. June 25, 2021), and this Court's decision in Zlotnick v. Equifax, 2022 WL 351996 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2022), counsel shall provide any authority or basis for plaintiff to assert standing in this action, or indicate whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court if appropriate. Defendants shall file any response thereto with five days of the filing by plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/26/2022. c/ecf (Cowan, Timothy)
May 26, 2022 Proposed summons is rejected; the caption does not reflect the full and exact caption of the Complaint. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Tirado, Chelsea)
May 25, 2022 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Aryeh Markovich (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Experian, #2 Proposed Summons Hyundai, #3 Proposed Summons Nissan, #4 Proposed Summons Transunion) (Saland, Tamir)
May 25, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
May 25, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
May 25, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
May 25, 2022 Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12, SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION; We have a new Clerk of the Court. Please re-submit using the current form, which is on our website. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta)
May 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Aryeh Markovich against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Hyundai Capital America, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, TransUnion, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15596367 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Aryeh Markovich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons) (Saland, Tamir)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markovich v. TransUnion, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aryeh Markovich
Represented By: Tamir Saland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TransUnion, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Represented By: Dennis Andrew Amore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Capital America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?