Murphy v. Walmart, et al
| Joanna Murphy |
| Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv03314 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| James M Wicks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Please See Order for Further Details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 7/22/2022. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
| Filing 11 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks: CIVIL CAUSE FOR INITIAL CONFERENCE. Counsel for Plaintiff: Frank Braunstein. Counsel for Defendant John Richard Petrowski. Initial Conference Hearing held on 7/22/2022 at 1:30 PM. Following discussion with counsel and review of the submitted worksheet, the Court adopted a Scheduling Order which is attached at DE #12 . A Status conference has been scheduled for October 24, 2022, at 9:30 AM via the Court's Video Zoom. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. A Pretrial conference has been scheduled for February 24, 2023, at 10:00 AM via the Court's Video Zoom. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. If Judge Joan M. Azrack requires one, a joint proposed pretrial order in compliance with Judge Azrack's requirements and signed by counsel for each party must be received by the undersigned 5 business days prior to this conference. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. (FTR Log #1:32-1:36 (Video).) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by Joanna Murphy (Braunstein, Frank) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank Braunstein on behalf of Joanna Murphy (aty to be noticed) (Braunstein, Frank) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart (Petrowski, John) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held on July 22, 2022, at 1:30 PM via Zoom before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than July 15, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 6/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. from Supreme, Suffolk, case number 603444/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15630993) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Pleadings, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Combined Demands, #4 Exhibit Ex. C - Response) (Petrowski, John) Modified on 6/6/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Petrowski, John) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Other Affiliate Wal-Mart De Mexico, Other Affiliate SEIYU for Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Petrowski, John) |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Walmart and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Petrowski, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
