Bordonaro v. Coden et al
| James Bordonaro |
| Jennifer Coden, Justice Roy S. Mahon, Errol Toulon, Jr. and Fido's Fences, Inc |
| 2:2022cv03446 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| James M Wicks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Emergency MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Jennifer Coden. (Attachments: #1 Affirmation in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Money Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - 7.11.22 DOB email, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C -7.11.22 JM Email, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - PACER Docket Report, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E - Grossman Order 1.12.16, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F - Memo and Order on Appeal, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G - Recorded Deed 1705 N Gardiner Drive, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H - Judge Pastoressa Order) (Coden, Jennifer) |
Filing 12
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via the Court's AT&T Teleconference line will be held on September 2, 2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The parties should dial 1-866-434-5269 and enter Access Code 9025281# at the prompt. All parties must attend. The parties are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than August 26, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. Copies of this Order and the attachments have been mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff James Bordonaro at the address noted on the docket sheet. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules, #3 Hofstra Legal Pro Se Assistance Program) (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Errol Toulon, Jr. re #10 Answer to Complaint (Lindemann, Marc) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Errol Toulon, Jr.. (Lindemann, Marc) |
| Filing 9 LETTER dated 6/22/2022 from Pro Se Office to James Bordonaro. The Court is in receipt of your letter dated June 21, 2022, in which you inquire as to why your new casewas deemed as related to your prior filings (15-CV-3025 and 22-CV-2545).Please be advised that your case was assigned to Judge Azrack because you had a prior action(s) here which was before her. Pursuant to the Guidelines for the Division of Business Among District Judges 50.J(e), prose cases are related to prior cases filed by the same prose party. Likewise, your case was directly assigned to the same Judges that were on your previous case(s). (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 8 LETTER dated 6/21/2022 from Jim Bordonaro to Judge Azrack and Pro-Se Office re "I have received this letter (enclosed) "Notice Of Related Case", and would ask your chambers to please expound as to why these three (3) case index numbers were made to be related?" (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 7 LETTER dated 6/15/2022 from Pro Se Office to James Bordonaro re Acknowledgment of Civil Action. (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Related Cases: 15-cv-3025-JMA and 22-cv-2545-JMA-JMW The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
|
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Order to Show Cause. The Court denies #3 Plaintiff's Proposed Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/13/2022. (Newbill, Quenique)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support re: #3 Proposed Order to Show Cause by James Bordonaro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by James Bordonaro (Cox, Dwayne) Modified on 6/13/2022 as per JMA's Chambers to change event to motion (Coleman, Laurie). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by James Bordonaro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 030055 (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
