Jakob v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| William Jakob |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2022cv03921 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Opposition) (Palumbo, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by William Jakob. (Palumbo, Anthony)
|
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's opposition is due September 3, 2022, and Defendant's reply is due September 11, 2022. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/30/2022. (Nkodo, Julie-Irene)
|
|
Filing 9
STATE COURT RECORD Received (Morales, James)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Karen J. Straub, Esq., #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Memorandum in Support, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service) (Straub, Karena)
|
|
SCHEDULING ORDER re #5 Motion for Pre-Motion Conference. The Court sets a briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss in lieu of a pre-motion conference: Defendant's motion is due August 9, 2022, Plaintiff's opposition is due August 30, 2022, and the reply, if any, is due September 8, 2022. The parties are directed to review Section IV.B of this Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/19/2022. (Nkodo, Julie-Irene)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION for pre motion conference for leave to file motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Response to Pre-Motion Letter filed by All Plaintiffs. (Palumbo, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for pre motion conference for leave to file motion to dismiss by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Straub, Karena)
|
|
Filing 4
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 3
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 2
Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Straub, Karena)
|
|
SECOND NOTICE: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Page two is missing from the docket. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. The second page of the Civil Cover Sheet is missing. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. from Supreme Court of the State of NY, County of Suffolk, case number 607622/2022. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15717403) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint) (Straub, Karena) Modified on 7/8/2022 (Landow, Concetta).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jakob v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Jakob | |
| Represented By: | Anthony H. Palumbo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Karena J. Straub |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
