Wittman v. KSF Acquisition Corporation
David Wittman |
KSF Acquisition Corporation |
2:2022cv04023 |
July 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Lee G Dunst |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Wittman (Abiri, Robert) |
Civil Case Terminated. (Greene, Donna) |
ELECTRONIC SCHEDULING ORDER: The initial conference will be held on 10/21/22 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst via the Court's video Zoom. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. The parties are directed to follow Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website, and submit a proposed discovery plan/scheduling order at least five business days prior to the initial conference pursuant to Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/26/2022. (Baron, Corey) |
Filing 9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by KSF Acquisition Corporation. (Cole, William) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 4(A) of my Individual Practices and Rules, the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion for a pre-motion conference #9 is due by September 1, 2022. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 8/25/2022. (Koenigsberg, Eric) |
ORDER granting DE #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint (DE #1 ) on or before 9/9/22. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/5/2022. (Baron, Corey) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by KSF Acquisition Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cole, William) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KSF Acquisition Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Glanbia, Inc. for KSF Acquisition Corporation. (Cole, William) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William P. Cole on behalf of KSF Acquisition Corporation (notification declined or already on case) (Cole, William) |
ORDER granting DE #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney William P. Cole shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/4/2022. (Baron, Corey) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-15811426. by KSF Acquisition Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of William P. Cole In Support of Motion for Pro Hac, #2 Proposed Order Re Pro Hac) (Cole, William) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Wittman. KSF Acquisition Corporation served on 7/18/2022, answer due 8/8/2022. (Abiri, Robert) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KSF Acquisition Corporation. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Landow, Concetta) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KSF Acquisition Corporation filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15731160 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by David Wittman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Abiri, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wittman v. KSF Acquisition Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Wittman | |
Represented By: | Robert Abiri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KSF Acquisition Corporation | |
Represented By: | William P. Cole |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.