Tenzer-Fuchs v. New Taiwan Trading Corp.
Plaintiff: Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs
Defendant: New Taiwan Trading Corp.
Case Number: 2:2022cv04028
Filed: July 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER re #7 : The time for New Taiwan Trading Corp. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including September 8, 2022.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/9/2022. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
August 8, 2022 Filing 7 Letter Motion Requesting Extension of Deadline to Respond to Complaint by New Taiwan Trading Corp. (Adler, Daniella) Modified on 8/9/2022 to change event type to motion (Coleman, Laurie).
August 8, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniella Adler on behalf of New Taiwan Trading Corp. (aty to be noticed) (Adler, Daniella)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs. New Taiwan Trading Corp. served on 7/18/2022, answer due 8/8/2022. (Shalom, Jonathan)
July 11, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to New Taiwan Trading Corp.. (Landow, Concetta)
July 11, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
July 11, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
July 11, 2022 Case Assgined to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
July 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEW TAIWAN TRADING CORP filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15731853 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Shalom, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tenzer-Fuchs v. New Taiwan Trading Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs
Represented By: Jonathan Shalom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Taiwan Trading Corp.
Represented By: Daniella Adler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?