Wong v. The Long Island Railroad Company et al
| Raymond Wong |
| The Long Island Railroad Company and The Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
| 2:2022cv04184 |
| July 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| James M Wicks |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held on October 13, 2022, at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than October 6, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline by which Defendants LIRR and MTA are to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to on or before October 7, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/13/2022. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Summons Returned Executed by The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (McCaffrey, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond Wong. The Long Island Railroad Company served on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022; The Metropolitan Transportation Authority served on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. (Dinhofer, Philip) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Layne, Monique) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The Clerk Of Court's name on the summons needs to be modified/updated. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Layne, Monique) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Raymond Wong (Dinhofer, Philip) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The name on the summons does not match the name as it appears on the complaint and all defendants were not listed Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15755412 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Raymond Wong. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dinhofer, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
