Steinberg v. Vidal
| Jeffrey Steinberg and Jeffrey Scott Steinberg |
| Kathi Vidal |
| 2:2022cv04971 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN by Jeffrey Scott Steinberg re #1 Complaint, #8 Amended Complaint served at United States Attorney for the E.D.N.Y. (NOTICE ONLY) on 10/17/2022. (LC) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement by Jeffrey Scott Steinberg. (Steinberg, Jeffrey) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Allow Pro Se to Electronically File. Before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion for ECF filing privileges (ECF No. #10 ). In its discretion and pursuant to Rule 5(d)(3)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Allow Pro Se to Electronically File, with the expectation that Plaintiff will judiciously exercise the privilege of electronic filing, and subject to revocation if the Court determines this privilege is being abused or revocation is otherwise warranted. Plaintiff shall register for ECF; registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. PLAINTIFF IS ON NOTICE: Thereafter, any paper filing by Plaintiff will not be accepted for filing and will be returned. Further, insofar as Plaintiff seeks a fee waiver for the use of PACER and CM/ECF, that request is DENIED at this time. As a party to this case, Plaintiff receives a Notice of Docket Activity each time a new docket entry is made with one free look at that entry. Plaintiff may print or save that document without incurring any fees. In addition, any PACER fees are automatically waived when a party's costs are $30 or less in a quarter and Court opinions are always free. Thus, Plaintiff has not demonstrated a need for a fee waiver and the application is thus DENIED. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/3/2022. (SP)
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kathi Vidal, U.S. Attorney (NOTICE ONLY) and U.S. Attorney General (NOTICE ONLY). (Coleman, Laurie) (Main Document 11 replaced on 9/29/2022) (Coleman, Laurie). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for leave to allow Pro Se to Electronically File and ECF Fee Waivers, by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
|
ORDER: By Order dated September 6, 2022 (ECF No. #5 ), the Court denied Plaintiff's original application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") and ordered him to pay the filing fee within fourteen days. Now before the Court are Plaintiff's renewed applications to proceed IFP and for electronic filing privileges, both filed on September 8, 2022 (ECF Nos. #6 #7 ), as well as Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (ECF No. #9 ). The Court liberally construes Plaintiff's subsequent applications to proceed IFP as seeking reconsideration of the September 6, 2022 Order. In light of the additional information provided to the Court in these submissions, the Court finds that Plaintiff is qualified to proceed IFP. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS his motions (ECF Nos. #6 #9 ) and ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court issue a summons to the Defendant and forward the summons together with copies of the complaint, the amended complaint, and this Order to the United States Marshal for service upon the Defendant forthwith. Plaintiff's application seeking electronic filing privileges is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to renew. As the Court made clear in its September 6, 2022 Order, any application seeking electronic filing privileges shall "indicate the reason such privileges are required. If granted, the Court will no longer accept or send hard copies from or to Plaintiff. Any renewed application for ECF filing privileges shall makeclear Plaintiff's understanding and acceptance of this responsibility." (ECF No. #5 at 1 n.1.) Plaintiff's submission omits this information and is thus DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 9/19/2022. (Patterson, Samuel)
|
| Filing 9 Supplemental MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kathi Vidal, filed by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for leave to allow Pro Se to Electronically File by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Valle, Christine) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; For the following reasons, the application to proceed IFP is denied and Plaintiff is ordered to remit the $402.00 filing fee within fourteen days in order for this case to proceed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff at his address of record. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 9/6/2022. (Valle, Christine)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Pro Se Office to Pro Se Litigant dated 8/23/2022 Re: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF YOUR CIVIL ACTION(S). (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathi Vidal Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Jeffrey Steinberg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
