Lulenski v. Long Island Rail Road Company
| Matthew R Lulenski and Matthew R. Lulenski |
| Long Island Rail Road Company |
| 2:2022cv05209 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Defendant's motion at DE #10 , with Plaintiff's consent at DE #11 , to extend the due date for Defendant's answer nunc pro tunc from 10/13/2022 to 10/14/202 is GRANTED. The filing of Defendant's answer at DE #9 is deemed timely. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/18/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 11 Letter by Matthew R. Lulenski (Lauriello, Valerie) |
|
ELECTRONIC SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter by 10/19/2022 informing the Court of whether he consents to Defendant's motion at DE #9 to extend the due date for Defendant's answer nunc pro tunc by one day, from 10/13/2022 to 10/14/2022. The undersigned will hold the initial conference on 12/16/2022 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 830 of the U.S. District Court E.D.N.Y. Long Island Courthouse, located at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York. The parties are directed to follow the undersigned's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website, and submit a proposed discovery plan/scheduling order at least five business days prior to the initial conference pursuant to the undersigned's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/17/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Answer to Complaint by Long Island Rail Road Company. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Long Island Rail Road Company. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Long Island Rail Road Company identifying Corporate Parent MTA, Other Affiliate MTA Bridges and Tunnels, Other Affiliate MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad, Other Affiliate MTA New York City Transit Authority, Other Affiliate MTA Staten Island Railway, Other Affiliate MTA Capital Construction, Other Affiliate MTA Bus Company for Long Island Rail Road Company. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J Pogan on behalf of Long Island Rail Road Company (notification declined or already on case) (Pogan, Christopher) |
|
ORDER granting DE #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (DE #1 ) on or before 10/13/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 9/30/2022. (Baron, Corey)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION Extending Time To Answer by Long Island Rail Road Company (Pogan, Christopher) Modified docket entry from stipulation to motion on 9/30/2022 (Tirado, Chelsea). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J Pogan on behalf of Long Island Rail Road Company (aty to be noticed) (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew R. Lulenski. Long Island Rail Road Company served on 9/9/2022, answer due 9/30/2022. (Lauriello, Valerie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Long Island Rail Road Company. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Long Island Rail Road Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15896946 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Matthew R Lulenski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lauriello, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
