Chamale-Eustace v. State University of New York at Stony Brook et al
| Monica Chamale-Eustace |
| State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook Medicine and Matthew Berchuck, M.D. |
| 2:2022cv05307 |
| September 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time #13 is granted. Plaintiff shall respond to defendants' motion for a pre-motion conference #12 by 11/11/2022. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/31/2022. (Miyamoto, Matthew)
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding SUNY's anticipated motion to dismiss by Monica Chamale-Eustace. (Chao, Brendan) |
| Filing 12 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding SUNY's anticipated motion to dismiss by State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital. (Dietz, Eva) |
|
ORDER granting DE #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The date by which defendant Matthew Berchuck, M.D. must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (DE #1 ) is EXTENDED to 11/28/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/28/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Matthew Berchuck, M.D.. (Dietz, Eva) |
|
ORDER: Defendants' motion at DE #10 for an extension of time to answer the Complaint (DE #1 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each request for an extension of time must contain the information required by the undersigned's Individual Practice Rule II.E.4, including a statement of whether the other party consents to the request. Defendants' motion lacks that information and is accordingly denied without prejudice. See Testaccio v. Rahim, No. 21-CV-1916, 2021 WL 1999411, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2021) (denying motion without prejudice for failure to comply with Court's Individual Practice Rules). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/27/2022. (CB)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Matthew Berchuck, M.D.. (Dietz, Eva) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Chamale-Eustace. Matthew Berchuck, M.D. served on 10/7/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Chao, Brendan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Chamale-Eustace. Stony Brook Medicine served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Chao, Brendan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Chamale-Eustace. Stony Brook University Hospital served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Chao, Brendan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monica Chamale-Eustace. State University of New York at Stony Brook served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/28/2022. (Chao, Brendan) |
|
ORDER: The consent motion at DE #5 by defendants State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook Medicine, and Stony Brook University Hospital (together, "SUNY") for an extension of time to answer the Complaint is GRANTED. SUNY shall respond to the Complaint (DE #1 ) on or before 10/28/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 9/26/2022. (Baron, Corey)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital. (Dietz, Eva) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15914439 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Monica Chamale-Eustace. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Chao, Brendan) Modified on 9/7/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
