Bugge et al v. The 3M Company et al
| Paul Bugge and Laura Martuscello |
| The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc., Archroma U.S., Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemdesign Products Inc., Chemguard Inc., Chemicals, Inc., Clariant Corporation, Corteva, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc., Dynax Corporation, E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Nation Ford Chemical Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC, LLC, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Tyco Fire Products LP and Doe Defendants 1-20 |
| 2:2022cv05398 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Lee G Dunst |
| James M Wicks |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATE COURT RECORD received from Judith Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk, Index No. 615010/2022. Since the above mentioned case is E-filed, there are no hard copies of the documents listed on the Civil Court Minutes Report. (JC) |
| Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in District of South Carolina as case 2:22-cv-03232, filed 09/22/2022. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 9 Certified JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-104): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-104): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Case transferred to District of South Carolina. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Florio, Lisa) |
Filing 7
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held October 25, 2022, at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than October 18, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks for all further proceedings. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 9/13/2022. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (Landow, Concetta). |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. by The 3M Company (Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed EDNY Civil Cover Sheet. The Civil Cover Sheet that has been uploaded is an SDNY Cover Sheet. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT - CIVIL COVER SHEET by The 3M Company. (Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The 3M Company (Sagalowsky, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The 3M Company from Supreme Court, case number 615010/2022.Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15925593) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint) (Sagalowsky, Jordan) Modified on 9/12/2022 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
