Butt v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. et al
| Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Company and Heinz G. Butt |
| Scottsdale Insurance Co. |
| 2:2022cv05673 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
DISCOVERY SCHEDULING ORDER: The following discovery deadlines are now in effect: Phase I discovery shall be completed by January 9, 2023. Any motion to join new parties or amend the pleadings must be made by February 6, 2023. Fact discovery shall be completed by July 7, 2023. Expert discovery shall be completed by October 6, 2023. Any party seeking to make a dispositive motion shall initiate that process, consistent with Judge Azrack's Individual Rules, on or before November 6, 2023. Counsel for the parties are directed to submit a joint status letter on January 10, 2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 11/15/2022. (DM)
|
| Filing 11 Letter Joint Submission following initial conference by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. (Cavallo, Christian) |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields:Initial Conference Hearing held on 10/26/2022 (FTR Log #10:38-10:48.) (JT) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth on the record during the conference held on October 26, 2022, counsel are directed to confer and on November 10, 2022, submit a joint letter advising this Court whether or not there is agreement to amend the complaint to dismiss Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and add Nationwide Excess & Surplus Specialty. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/26/2022. (DM)
|
| Filing 9 Letter Jointly submitted by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Co. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proposed Discovery Plan Worksheet) (Cavallo, Christian) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to October 28, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/13/2022. (DM)
|
| Filing 8 STATE COURT RECORD Received from Suffolk County Supreme Court re E-filed Supreme Court case, Index #616741/2022. (LC) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Co.. (Cavallo, Christian) |
| Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Co.. (Cavallo, Christian) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 10/26/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields.The parties are directed to call the AT&TTeleconferencing Center at (877) 810-9415 and to enter Access Code9005911 when prompted. See order and attachment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 9/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (Torres, Jasmine)
|
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to October 14, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 9/28/2022. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Co. (Cavallo, Christian) Modified on 9/23/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Scottsdale Insurance Co. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County, case number 616741/2022. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15968730) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service) (Cavallo, Christian) Modified on 9/23/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. A Civil Cover Sheet was not filed; the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
