Gansky v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bettina Gansky
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv05826
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Nina Morrison
2 Judge: James M Wicks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Peikes, Lawrence)
October 28, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Peikes, Lawrence)
October 17, 2022 Case Reassigned to Judge Nina Morrison. Judge Joan M. Azrack no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AM)
October 11, 2022 Filing 7 STATE COURT RECORD Received from Suffolk County Supreme Court re E-filed Supreme Court case, Index #616981/2022. (LC)
October 4, 2022 Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Peikes, Lawrence)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to complaint. Defendant's time within which to respond to the complaint is hereby extended to and including October 27, 2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 10/4/2022. (Wicks, James)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held November 29, 2022, at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than November 22, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (DF by JT)
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
September 30, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
September 30, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
September 29, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Peikes, Lawrence)
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Suffolk, case number 616981/2022. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15989257) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint) (Peikes, Lawrence) Modified on 9/30/2022 (Landow, Concetta).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gansky v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bettina Gansky
Represented By: David M. Fish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence Peikes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?