Shapiro v. UnitedHealthcare Service LLC
| Wendy Shapiro |
| UnitedHealthcare Service LLC |
| 2:2022cv05908 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Wendy Shapiro. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation) (Simon, David) |
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant UnitedHealthcare Service LLC's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED through 1/10/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 11/10/2022. (DM)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Wendy Shapiro. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation) (Simon, David) |
|
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The plaintiff's letter application #10 for an extension of time to serve and file an answer is DENIED without prejudice to re-file their application addressed to MJ Shields who will be handling all pre-trial matters in this litigation. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/9/2022. (MI)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the non-binding Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7. The Rule requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7. An Arbitration Hearing will be scheduled after an Answer is filed. (RC) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (RC) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wendy Shapiro. UnitedHealthcare Service LLC served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Simon, David) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/14/2022 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. The parties are directed to call the AT&TTeleconferencing Center at (877) 810-9415 and to enter Access Code9005911 when prompted. See order and attachment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (JT)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to UnitedHealthcare Service LLC. (CL) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (CL) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Wendy Shapiro (Simon, David) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Wendy Shapiro (Simon, David) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. A Civil Cover Sheet was not filed; the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wendy Shapiro filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16000922 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed YES,, filed by Wendy Shapiro. (Simon, David) Modified on 10/4/2022 (CL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shapiro v. UnitedHealthcare Service LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Shapiro | |
| Represented By: | David Simon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UnitedHealthcare Service LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
