Davis v. Gillespie et al
| Stanley Davis |
| Alexander H Gillespie, Timothy Gilmartin, Rapheal Pearl, Goldberg & Segalla LLP, Siben & Siben, Hon. Judge Martha Luft, Hon. David Reilly, Andrea Mims, John Peterson and Wendy Stynes |
| 2:2022cv06207 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Gary R Brown |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Stanley Davis dtd 12/5/2022 returning the enclosed letter without docketing or consideration: Papers cannot be filed without indicating that they have been served on all parties in your action, or their attorneys. It does not appear that all parties have been served with a copy of your filing. (JC) |
| Filing 23 Notice of MOTION for Summary Judgment by Stanley Davis. (JC) |
| Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of service for letter dated November 8 2022 seeking permission to move to dismiss on behalf of state defendants by Timothy Gilmartin (Connolly, Susan) |
| Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of service of Notice of Appearance on behalf of all State defendants by Timothy Gilmartin (Connolly, Susan) |
| Filing 20 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #17 Notice of Appearance, #18 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference Affidavit of Service via electronic mail by Alexander H Gillespie (Rosenfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 19 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #17 Notice of Appearance, #18 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference Affidavit of Service via regular mail by Alexander H Gillespie (Rosenfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 18 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Alexander H Gillespie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Rosenfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven H. Rosenfeld on behalf of Alexander H Gillespie (aty to be noticed) (Rosenfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 16 Letter seeking premotion conference for permission to move to dismiss the Complaint on behalf of State defendants by Alexander H Gillespie (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Connolly, Susan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan M. Connolly on behalf of Timothy Gilmartin (aty to be noticed) (Connolly, Susan) |
| Filing 14 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Goldberg & Segalla LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email, #2 Exhibit B - Email, #3 Exhibit C - Email) (Straus, Stephen) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for pre motion conference by Goldberg & Segalla LLP. (Straus, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen D. Straus on behalf of Goldberg & Segalla LLP (aty to be noticed) (Straus, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for pre motion conference by Siben & Siben. (Zamurs, Karl) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Related Cases: 15-cv-7009-JFB-ARL, 18-cv-303-JMA-AYS, 21-cv-456-JMA, 21-cv-2338-JMA-ARL, 22-cv-6472-JMA-AYS and 22-cv-6438-GRB-AYS The Case was directly assigned as a related Pro Se/Habeas Case. (DC) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Related Cases: 15-cv-7009-JFB-ARL, 18-cv-303-JMA-AYS, 21-cv-456-JMA, 21-cv-2238-JMA-ARL and 22-cv-6438-GRB-AYS The Case was directly assigned as a related Pro Se/Habeas Case. (DC) |
Filing 8
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Joan M. Azrack recused. Case reassigned to Judge Gary R. Brown for all further proceedings. The undersigned hereby recuses herself from this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455 (a) and it is requested that the Clerk of the Court reassign this matter to a selected District Judge. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 10/27/2022. c/m to pro se plaintiff (LC)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Karl Egils Zamurs on behalf of Siben & Siben (aty to be noticed) (Zamurs, Karl) |
| Filing 6 LETTER dated 10/25/2022 from Pro Se Department to Stanley Davis re Acknowledgment of receipt of civil action. (LC) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanley Davis. Timothy Gilmartin served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; Martha Luft served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; Andrea Mims served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; Rapheal Pearl served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; John Peterson served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; David Reilly served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022; Siben & Siben served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (LC) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Related Cases: 15-cv-7009-JFB-ARL, 18-cv-303-JMA-AYS, 21-cv-456-JMA and 21-cv-2238-JMA-ARL The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (DC) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (DC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Stanley Davis. (DC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/18/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LF). |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 200000483 (DC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
