Kerdniyom v. NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc.
| Lamduan Kerdniyom and NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. d/b/a Bambu |
| NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. doing business as Bambu |
| 2:2022cv06268 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| James M Wicks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held on December 21, 2022 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks via the Court's Video Zoom. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Following the conference, the Court will issue a Discovery Order tailored to the circumstances of this FLSA case. As such, counsel need not prepare a discovery worksheet prior to the Initial Conference. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 11/21/2022. (DF)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc.. (Alamgir, Taimur) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Taimur Alamgir on behalf of NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Alamgir, Taimur) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Nathaniel Solomon on behalf of NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Solomon, Aaron) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 11/18/2022. (RT)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/18/2022) (LJ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NY Dessert & Drinks, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16045955 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Lamduan Kerdniyom. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Barnhorn, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
