Gueci v. Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Justin Gueci |
Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Terry Sawaya, Michael Sawaya and Assad S. Sawaya |
2:2022cv06343 |
October 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Steven Tiscione |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER. Defendants' #6 Motion to Reassign this action to the Central Islip courthouse is respectfully denied, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules for the Division of Business for the Eastern District of New York, as referenced in Rule 2(f). Defendants' request for the action to be reassigned to a Magistrate Judge located in Central Islip is denied as moot, as the currently assigned Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione is located in Central Islip. The parties are reminded that they may consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/16/2022. (ML) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , MOTION to Reassign Case to Central Islip Courthouse pursuant to Rule 2(f) of the Rules for the Division of Business for the Eastern District of New York, by Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Assad S. Sawaya, Michael Sawaya, Terry Sawaya. (Behar, Jarrett) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to January 12, 2023 to Answer #6 #1 Complaint, for All Defendants. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 12/14/2022. (LV) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Justin Gueci. Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022; Assad S. Sawaya served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022; Michael Sawaya served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022; Terry Sawaya served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Rehman, Aneeba) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CL) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (CL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altaire Pharmaceuticals, Assad S. Sawaya, Michael Sawaya, Terry Sawaya filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16058562, filed by Justin Gueci. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rehman, Aneeba) Modified on 10/20/2022 (CL). |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.