Perri v. The Long Island Railroad Company et al
| Nicholas Perri |
| The Long Island Railroad Company and The Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
| 2:2022cv06347 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Pamela K Chen |
| James M Wicks |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants. (Pogan, Christopher) |
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The consent motion for a one-day extension of Defendants' time to answer is hereby granted. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 12/15/2022. (MSH)
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Long Island Railroad Company identifying Other Affiliate MTA Bridges and Tunnels, Other Affiliate MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad, Other Affiliate MTA Staten Island Railway, Other Affiliate MTA Capital Construction, Other Affiliate MTA Bus Company, Other Affiliate MTA New York City Transit for The Long Island Railroad Company. (Pogan, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J Pogan on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Pogan, Christopher) |
|
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The initial conference is rescheduled for January 23, 2023 at 12:00 PM via Zoom before the undersigned. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 12/6/2022. (MSH)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Adjourn Conference by The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Yodice, Christopher) |
|
ORDER. Counsel were directed to complete the Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order (attached to DE #8 ) and electronically file same with the Court no later than December 1, 2022. No filing was made. Counsel are hereby directed to comply with the Courts order on or before December 6, 2022. The parties are reminded that should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 12/5/2022. (MSH)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held December 7, 2022 at 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than December 1, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 11/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (DF)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' time within which to respond to the complaint is hereby extended to and including 12/13/2022.So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 11/9/2022. (MSH)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Yodice, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicholas Perri. The Long Island Railroad Company served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022; The Metropolitan Transportation Authority served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Dinhofer, Philip) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen for all further proceedings. Judge Gary R. Brown no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 10/24/2022. (PB)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (PB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/21/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (LJ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Long Island Railroad Company, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16058863 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Nicholas Perri. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dinhofer, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
