Haziz-Ramadhan v. Meersyed et al
| Saidah Naeemah: Haziz-Ramadhan |
| Akmal Meersyed, Edward C. Hansen, Cheryl M. Helfer, Steven L. Ukeiley, Terry Dolan, Nick Oldfield, Jonathan W. Lipshie, Jonathan A. Baum, Errol D. Toulon, Jr. and Judith A. Pascale |
| 2:2022cv06435 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| James M Wicks |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER finding as moot #16 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. See Electronic Order dated 12/09/2022 dismissing the plaintiff's claim. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 12/15/2022. (JT)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Ross J. Kartez on behalf of Jonathan W. Lipshie (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Kartez, Ross) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for pre motion conference by Jonathan W. Lipshie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Judgment Documents) (Morgenstern, Rachel) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Case closed as per 12/9/2022 Order denying 12 Motion for Order to Show Cause. (JC) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Appearance and Letter Request for Pre Motion Conference served on SAIDAH-NAEEMAH: HAZIZ-RAMADHAN on 12/09/2022, filed by Jonathan W. Lipshie. (Morgenstern, Rachel) |
| Filing 14 Letter Request for a Pre-Motion Conference by Jonathan W. Lipshie (Morgenstern, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel A Morgenstern on behalf of Jonathan W. Lipshie (aty to be noticed) (Morgenstern, Rachel) |
|
ORDER denying #12 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff pro se Saidah Naeemah: Haziz-Ramadhan, brings this action against several Suffolk County District Court Judges and others in an effort to challenge a pending eviction through, inter alia, the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") as against the execution of a Warrant of Eviction. Plaintiff previously attempted to remove this case to federal court, which was remanded back to state court for failure to obtain the consent of all defendants and comply with the 30-day time limit for removals. See 22-cv-6436, Electronic Order dated October 27, 2022.Of course, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, this Court accords her claims the solicitude afforded to pro se litigants. See Tracy v. Freshwater, 623 F.3d 90, 101 (2d Cir. 2010) ("It is well established that a court is ordinarily obligated to afford a special solicitude to pro se litigants... [which] most often consists of liberal construction of pleadings, motion papers, and appellate briefs."). While the complaint cites a broad array of legal theories, it is devoid of any cognizable facts upon which this Court could grant relief. See Docket Entry No. 1. Moreover, because the complaint seems to be an effort by an unsuccessful state court litigant to relitigate matters before this Court, under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the Court would be required to abstain from the exercise of jurisdiction. See Vossbrinck v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., 773 F.3d 423, 425 (2d Cir. 2014) (under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine federal court lacks jurisdiction where plaintiff challenges state foreclosure judgment). Based on these considerations, the application for a TRO is DENIED, and the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice.The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff and to close the case. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 12/9/2022. (JT)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Order to Show Cause /AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Saidah Naeemah: Haziz-Ramadhan. (GO) |
| Filing 11 Answer with affirmative defenses ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jonathan A. Baum. (Baum, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 Verified ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Edward C. Hansen. (JC) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. Indicated that this case is related to the following case(s): 22-cv-6436-GRB (GO) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, by Cheryl M. Helfer. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Pack, Lori) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Jonathan A. Baum, Terry Dolan, Edward C. Hansen, Cheryl M. Helfer, Jonathan W. Lipshie, Akmal Meersyed, Nick Oldfield, Judith A. Pascale, Errol D. Toulon, Jr., Steven L. Ukeiley. (JC) |
| Filing 6 FILING FEE: $402.00, receipt number 200000573. (GO) |
| Filing 5 Letter from pro se dept. to Haziz-Ramadhan dtd 11/3/2022 acknowledging receipt to the civil action. (JC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice and with leave to renew upon filing the enclosed Long Form. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing fee. Plaintiff shall either file the Long Form or remit the filing fee within two (2) weeks of the date of this Order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 10/31/2022. (GO) (c/m to pro se)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Saidah Naeemah: Haziz-Ramadhan. (DC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Saidah Naeemah: Haziz-Ramadhan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
