Trader Joe's Company v. Century 18 Inc. et al
| Trader Joes Company and Trader Joe's Company |
| Century 18 Inc. d/b/a Crazy Berel, Century 18 Inc. a New York Corporation doing business as Crazy Berel and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv06548 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Century 18 Inc.. (Berkowitz, Mark) |
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Century 18 Inc.'s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 12/22/2022. SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 11/23/2022. (CT)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Century 18 Inc.. (Berkowitz, Mark) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Berkowitz on behalf of Century 18 Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Berkowitz, Mark) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Century 18 Inc. (LJ) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3 (1 of 3), #5 Exhibit 3 (2 of 3), #6 Exhibit 3 (3 of 3), #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5) (LJ) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Incorrect Case/Document Entry Information. Added missing Defendant Does 1-10 to the case to conform to the Complaint. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint and Exhibits) and re-entered as against all Defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Trader Joe's Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3 (1 of 3), #4 Exhibit 3 (2 of 3), #5 Exhibit 3 (3 of 3), #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (LJ) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16084325 (LJ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Trader Joe's Company (Kublanovsky, Eugene) Modified on 10/28/2022 (LJ). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trader Joe's Company identifying Corporate Parent TACT Holding Inc for Trader Joes Company. (Kublanovsky, Eugene) Modified on 10/28/2022 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
