Zheng v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Jaseline Haeye Zheng
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2022cv07260
Filed: November 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaseline Haeye Zheng. Kilolo Kijakazi served on 12/6/2022, answer due 2/6/2023. (DeHaan, John)
November 30, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Fishel on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (aty to be noticed) (Fishel, Shannon)
November 30, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (LJ)
November 30, 2022 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ)
November 30, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ)
November 30, 2022 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT to Correct Caption against Kilolo Kijokazi, filed by Jaseline Haeye Zheng. (DeHaan, John)
November 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijokazi Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Jaseline Haeye Zheng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (LJ)
November 30, 2022 FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16181892 (LJ)
November 30, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ)
November 30, 2022 Incorrect Case/Document Entry Information. Deleted Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi and added Defendant Kilolo Kijokazi to conform to the caption on the Complaint. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet and Proposed Summons) and re-entered as against Defendant. (LJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zheng v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaseline Haeye Zheng
Represented By: John W. DeHaan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Represented By: Shannon Fishel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?