Gross v. Intratek Computer Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Frederick Gross
Defendant: Intratek Computer Inc., Northport VA Medical Center and Robert Ziskin
Case Number: 2:2022cv07440
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Anne Y Shields
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Frederick Gross take nothing of Defendants Intratek Computer, Inc., Northport VA Medical Center, and Robert Ziskin; that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; that leave to further amend the complaint is denied; that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 1/10/2023 (CM to pro se plaintiff with an appeal packet). (JT)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Based on the foregoing, plaintiffs renewed application to proceed IFP is granted. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Clerk of the Court shall also mail this Order to the Plaintiff at his address of record and note such mailing on the docket. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 1/10/2023. (JC)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick Gross. (JC)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice and with leave to renew upon filing the enclosed Long Form. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing fee.1 Plaintiff shall either file the Long Form or remit the filing fee within two (2) weeks of the date of this Order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 12/22/2022. (CM with long form). (JC) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/22/2022) (JC).
December 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Frederick Gross dtd 12/14/2022 acknowledging receipt to the civil action. (JC)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Related Case: 12-cv-2804-JFB-AKT The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (DC)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick Gross. (DC)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Frederick Gross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gross v. Intratek Computer Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intratek Computer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northport VA Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Ziskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?