Both v. Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. et al
| John Both |
| Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. and Ethne Nance |
| 2:2022cv07578 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Diane Gujarati |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-09933. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
Filing 5
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case in this court. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/7/22) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.]
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
| Filing 4 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: John Both consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by John Both..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION in Support re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by John Both..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Permission for John Both to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by John Both..(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethne Nance, Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc.. Document filed by John Both. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh.).(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 12/14/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
