Purvis et al v. Suffolk County et al
Ms. LaTonya Purvis, Infant R. J. and LaTonya Purvis |
Suffolk County, Suffolk County Police Department, John and Jane Doe Police Officers 1-10, Bernard Stancil, County of Suffolk and Acting Police Comm. Stuart Cameron |
2:2023cv00445 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Anne Y Shields |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY (LJ) |
Filing 12 (CORRECTED) AMENDED Summons Reissued as to Stuart Cameron, County of Suffolk, Bernard Stancil, Suffolk County Police Department. (ML) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #9 Amended Complaint by LaTonya Purvis (Manuel, Albert) |
Filing 10 AMENDED Summons Issued as to Stuart Cameron, County of Suffolk, Bernard Stancil, Suffolk County Police Department. (ML) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by LaTonya Purvis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Manuel, Albert) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cobia Malik Powell on behalf of LaTonya Purvis (aty to be noticed) (Powell, Cobia) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Leah Elizabeth Jackson on behalf of LaTonya Purvis (aty to be noticed) (Jackson, Leah) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick K. Brewington on behalf of LaTonya Purvis (notification declined or already on case) (Brewington, Frederick) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 5/16/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields.The parties are directed to call the AT&T Teleconferencing Center at (877) 810-9415 and to enter Access Code 9005911 when prompted. See order and attachment.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 1/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (JT) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to County of Suffolk, Police Commissioner Geraldine Hart, Bernard Stancil, Suffolk County Police Department. (AC) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (AC) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (AC) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNYEDC-16328996 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by LaTonya Purvis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (AC) Modified on 1/23/2023 (AC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.