Mercado v. The Long Island Railroad Company
| Louis A. Mercado |
| The Long Island Railroad Company |
| 2:2023cv01201 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court will hold an Initial Conference on 5/26/2023 at 11:00 AM via Zoom. The Court will email a Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. The parties are directed to follow Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website, and submit a proposed discovery plan/scheduling order at least five business days prior to the initial conference pursuant to Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 3/3/2023. (CT)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by All Defendants. (Beyrer, John) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Long Island Railroad Company. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Long Island Railroad Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number BNYEDC-16407918 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Louis A. Mercado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Vogt, Philip) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mercado v. The Long Island Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Louis A. Mercado | |
| Represented By: | Philip Patrick Vogt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Long Island Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | John Aloysius Beyrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
