Clarke v. Garland et al
| Fedley Clarke |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Cora A. Mantell |
| 2:2023cv01402 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(b); and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 4/19/2023. (JT) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF REMAND re #8 . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above-captioned action, that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are hereby remanded to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorneys' fees to any party, subject to the provisions of paragraph 2 herein. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 4/18/2023. (LC)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and proposed order of remand by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Cora A. Mantell, Alejandro Mayorkas (Lipari, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Lipari on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Lipari, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Application for Writ by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Cora A. Mantell, Alejandro Mayorkas (Lipari, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fedley Clarke. Merrick Garland served on 3/9/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Cora A. Mantell served on 3/7/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Goldman, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (LJ) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Cora A. Mantell, Alejandro N. Mayorkas filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16432495 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Fedley Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Goldman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
