Ingram v. Georgica Property Management LLC
| Ian Ingram |
| Georgica Property Management LLC |
| 2:2023cv01500 |
| February 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven I Locke |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ian Ingram. Georgica Property Management LLC served on 3/3/2023, answer due 3/24/2023. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Georgica Property Management LLC. (LC) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Ian Ingram (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (AC) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (AC) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AC) |
| NOTICE; Proposed summons is rejected; the caption on the summons does not match the caption of the complaint; Specifically, the summons must be in English. The Clerk's Office cannot issue the summons with an incorrect caption. Counsel is advised to submit a completed proposed summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (AC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Georgica Property Management LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16442530 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Ian Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ingram v. Georgica Property Management LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ian Ingram | |
| Represented By: | Abdul Karim Hassan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Georgica Property Management LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
