Jackson v. The State of New York
Petitioner: Edwin Jackson and Erwin Jackson
Respondent: The State of New York
Case Number: 2:2023cv02372
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION. This Court transfers this case to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/27/2023 ) c/m (RG)
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Appeal Record Sent to USCA Successive Habeas Petition sent to US Court of Appeals #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order Transferring Case (Successive Petition) (VJ)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan for all further proceedings. Judge Rachel P. Kovner no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/14/2023. (SR)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner for all further proceedings. Judge Brian M. Cogan no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/14/2023. (SR)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. (BBM)
March 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A filing fee of $5 is required in order to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 or 2254 - or - you may request to waive the filing fee of $5 by completing an in forma pauperis application (also known as IFP). (DC)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion to Modify Pursuant to 28:1651 - Writ of Error Coram Nobis, filed by Edwin Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. The State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edwin Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erwin Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?