Hurson v. Rich Executive Pavers, Experienced Masonry Inc. et al.
Plaintiff: Lori Hurson
Defendant: Rich Executive Pavers, Experienced Masonry Inc. et al.
Case Number: 2:2023cv02791
Filed: April 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Lee G Dunst
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Accordingly, Plaintiff can best set forth her current financial position on the Long Form. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice and with leave to renew upon filing the enclosed Long Form. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing fee. Plaintiff is cautioned that, once paid, there are no refunds of the filing fee regardless of the outcome of the case. Plaintiff shall either file the Long Form or remit the filing fee within two (2) weeks of the date of this Order or this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S. C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/4/2023. (CM to Plaintiff with form) (JC)
April 20, 2023 Filing 4 Letter from Pro Se Dept. to Lori Hurson dtd 4/20/23 acknowledging receipt to this civil action. (JC)
April 17, 2023 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC)
April 10, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lori Hurson. (DC)
April 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rich Executive Pavers, Experienced Masonry Inc. et al. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Lori Hurson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hurson v. Rich Executive Pavers, Experienced Masonry Inc. et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Hurson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rich Executive Pavers, Experienced Masonry Inc. et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?