Bettes v. Altice USA, Inc. et al
| Alicia Bettes |
| Altice USA, Inc. and Robert Rivas |
| 2:2023cv03128 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Steven Tiscione |
| James M Wicks |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Michael Vento on behalf of Altice USA, Inc., Robert Rivas (aty to be noticed) (Vento, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Altice USA, Inc., Robert Rivas (Smith, Cameron) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Cameron Alexander Smith on behalf of Altice USA, Inc., Robert Rivas (aty to be noticed) (Smith, Cameron) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alicia Bettes. Robert Rivas waiver sent on 5/2/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Gottlieb, David) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Alicia Bettes. Altice USA, Inc. waiver sent on 5/2/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Gottlieb, David) |
| Email Notification Test - DO NOT REPLY. (CV) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks recused. Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione for all further proceedings. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 4/26/2023. (GO)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Evan Gottlieb on behalf of Alicia Bettes (notification declined or already on case) (Gottlieb, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John S. Crain on behalf of Alicia Bettes (notification declined or already on case) (Crain, John) |
| Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (AC) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Robert Rivas. (AC) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Altice USA, Inc. (AC) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (AC) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Alicia Bettes (Gottlieb, David) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Alicia Bettes (Gottlieb, David) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Alicia Bettes (Gottlieb, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altice USA, Inc., Robert Rivas filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16632572 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Alicia Bettes. (Gottlieb, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
