United States of America v. Morrison et al
| United States of America |
| Charolette Morrison, New York State Department of Labor, Suffolk County, New York and Town of Brookhaven, New York |
| 2:2023cv03399 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. New York State Department of Labor served on 6/6/2023, answer due 6/27/2023. (Sarnell, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Charolette Morrison served on 6/7/2023, answer due 6/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Printout of DMV Records) (Sarnell, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Charolette Morrison, New York State Department of Labor, Suffolk County, New York, Town of Brookhaven, New York. (LC) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons for Defendant NY State Dept of Labor, #2 Proposed Summons for Defendant Suffolk County, NY, #3 Proposed Summons for Defendant Town of Brookhaven, NY) (Sarnell, Bradley) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charolette Morrison, New York State Department of Labor, Suffolk County, New York, Town of Brookhaven, New York Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Defendant Charolette Morrison, #3 Proposed Summons for Defendant New York State Department of Labor, #4 Proposed Summons for Defendant Suffolk County, New York, #5 Proposed Summons for Defendant Town of Brookhaven, New York) (Sarnell, Bradley) Modified on 5/5/2023 (LJ). |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for the following reasons: The caption on each summons does not match the caption as it appears on the complaint. Further, The CLERK OF COURT name needs to be updated. As of 2/1/2022, Brenna B. Mahoney is the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of New York. Please correct and resubmit using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
