Delman v. Gatto et al
Mr. Edward Delman and Edward Delman |
Mr. Michael Gatto, Ms. Patricia Hanrahan-Gatto, Michael Gatto and Patricia Hanrahan-Gatto |
2:2023cv03524 |
May 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Rachel P Kovner |
Anne Y Shields |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields:Initial Conference Hearing held on 6/27/2023 (FTR Log #1:34-1:38.) (JT) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: As stated on the record during the initial conference held today, the parties' proposed discovery schedule is hereby So Ordered. Fact discovery shall be completed by January 19, 2024. Expert discovery shall be completed by March 19, 2024. Any party seeking to make a dispositive motion shall initiate that process, consistent with the Individual Rules of the assigned District Judge, on or before April 26, 2024. A joint pretrial order shall be filed on or before July 26, 2023 or within two (2) weeks of a decision on any dispositive motion(s). Counsel for the parties shall submit a joint status letter to this Court on or before August 28, 2023. The joint status letter shall contain dates certain for the taking of all fact depositions, as well as a statement as to whether the parties will be using any experts in this matter, the number of such experts, and the matters as to which they will testify. The joint status letter shall also indicate whether the parties request this Court's assistance with settlement or a referral to the Eastern District mediation program. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 6/27/2023. (DM) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristen Nicole Sinnott on behalf of Edward Delman (aty to be noticed) (Sinnott, Kristen) |
Filing 12 Letter joint discovery by Edward Delman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Discovery Plan Worksheet) (Massaro, Jay) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel are reminded of their obligation to file an initial joint letter in advance of the initial conference scheduled for June 27, 2023. The letter shall be filed by 5:00 p.m. today, June 26, 2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 6/26/2023. (DM) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Michael Gatto, Patricia Hanrahan-Gatto. (Kreppein, Scott) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 6/27/2023 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. The parties are directed to call the AT&T Teleconferencing Center at (877) 810-9415 and to enter Access Code 9005911 when prompted. See order and attachment. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 5/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules) (JT) |
Filing 9 STATE COURT RECORD Received (IH) |
ORDER: Please see the #8 reply withdrawing the #5 letter motion for pre-motion conference. The #5 motion is withdrawn. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/22/23. (NCM) |
Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for MTD based on lack of service and failure to state a claim, addressed to Judge Kovner, WITHDRAWING REQUEST, filed by Michael Gatto, Patricia Hanrahan-Gatto. (Kreppein, Scott) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Joseph Massaro on behalf of Edward Delman (aty to be noticed) (Massaro, Jay) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for MTD based on lack of service and failure to state a claim, addressed to Judge Kovner, filed by Edward Delman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer) (Massaro, Jay) |
ORDER: Plaintiff shall respond to the #5 letter on or before 5/19/23. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 5/12/23. (NCM) |
Filing 5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference for MTD based on lack of service and failure to state a claim, addressed to Judge Kovner, by Michael Gatto, Patricia Hanrahan-Gatto. (Kreppein, Scott) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of Service by Michael Gatto (Kreppein, Scott) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court Suffolk County, case number 601269-2023. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16686771) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Kreppein, Scott) Modified on 5/11/2023 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.