Lawry v. Barone
Trevor Lawry |
John Doe and Deputy Warden Vincenzo Barone |
2:2023cv03625 |
May 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Steven I Locke |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Deputy Warden Vincenzo Barone. (Courtesy copy sent to Suffolk County Attorney 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788) (VM) |
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 #2 is hereby granted. The Court notes that although Plaintiff named John Doe, Warden of Yaphank Correctional Facility as the Defendant, Deputy Warden Vincenzo Barone is the Commanding Officer of that facility. See https://www.suffolkcountysheriffsoffice.com/command-staff-2/Deputy-Warden-Vincenzo-Barone (last visited 6/22/23). The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons and complaint upon Vincenzo Barone, the Deputy Warden of Yaphank Correctional Facility, without prepayment of fees. The action is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke for pretrial supervision. The Clerk of Court shall mail a courtesy copy of the summons and complaint to the Suffolk County Attorney. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 6/26/2023. (CG) |
Filing 8 Notice of Related Case: 23-cv-4400-LDH-SIL The Case was directly assigned as a related Pro Se/Habeas Case. (DC) |
Filing 7 Notice to Pay Civil Filing Fee - Prisoner Case dtd. 5/31/23 to Trevor Lawry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff/petitioner is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiffs/petitioners prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). Original letter sent to the Warden/Superintendent of Correctional Facility by Pro Se Writ Clerk. (ML) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Authorization Form (PLRA) filed by Trevor Lawry dtd. 5/20/2023. (ML) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (DC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , #1 Complaint. The papers are deficient as you must also complete the Prisoner Authorization (PLRA) form along with the IFP application. (DC) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Trevor Lawry. (DC) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trevor Lawry. (DC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Trevor Lawry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.