Yuquilema v. C M Richey Inc. et al
| Guillermo Yuquilema |
| C M Richey Inc., Christopher Richey, CM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE CORP and Chaim Mandel |
| 2:2023cv04032 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint by 9/23/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 7/24/2023. (CT)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE CORP, Chaim Mandel. (Bruck, Yair) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Yair Bruck on behalf of CM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE CORP, Chaim Mandel (aty to be noticed) (Bruck, Yair) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on CM Electrical Maintenance Corp and Chaim Mandel on 6/16/2023, filed by Guillermo Yuquilema. (Stillman, Lina) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE CORP, Chaim Mandel. (LC) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE CORP, Chaim Mandel, filed by Guillermo Yuquilema. (LC) |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information: The 8 Amended Complaint has been deleted from the above-referenced case and re-entered as counsel did not add the new defendant. All corrections have been made. No action is required by counsel. (LC) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Guillermo Yuquilema. C M Richey Inc. served on 6/2/2023, answer due 6/23/2023. (Stillman, Lina) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (LJ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/1/2023) (LJ). |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/1/2023: #1 Additional Corrections) (LJ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Guillermo Yuquilema (Stillman, Lina) Modified on 6/1/2023 (LJ). |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Guillermo Yuquilema (Stillman, Lina) Modified on 6/1/2023 (LJ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C M Richey Inc., Christopher Richey filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16751021 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Guillermo Yuquilema. (Stillman, Lina) Modified on 6/1/2023 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
