Duan v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
| Y Duan |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), New York Asylum Office, USCIS, Director Ur M. Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Associate Director Ted H. Kim, Director Patricia Menges, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ted H. Kim and Patricia Menges |
| 2:2023cv04555 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Y Duan. Ur M. Jaddou served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; Ted H. Kim served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; Patricia Menges served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; New York Asylum Office, USCIS served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) served on 6/30/2023, answer due 8/29/2023. (Milch, Aleksander) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Artemis Lekakis on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Lekakis, Artemis) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (FP) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Y Duan (Milch, Aleksander) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| A summons was not issued for the following reason: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia Menges, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16811731 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Y Duan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A--USCIS Filing Receipt, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B--Demand Letter to New York Asylum Office, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C--USCIS Policy Statement Release, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Milch, Aleksander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
