S.J. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
| S.J. |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Alejandro Mayorkas, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, John Lafferty, Matthew D. Emrich and Patricia A. Menges |
| 2:2023cv04925 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order dismissing case. The Stipulation of Dismissal at #9 is so ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 7/31/2023. (JL)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice, respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by Matthew D. Emrich, Ted H. Kim, John Lafferty, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou (Territola, Toniann) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by S.J.. Matthew D. Emrich served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; Ted H. Kim served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; John Lafferty served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; Patricia A. Menges served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; New York Asylum Office, USCIS served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. (Schwartzberg, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Toniann Territola on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Territola, Toniann) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CL) |
|
Order granting #2 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff may proceed anonymously using the pseudonym "S.J." Any party to this action shall refer to Plaintiff as "Plaintiff," "S.J.," or by some other manner that avoids referring to Plaintiff's name. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 7/6/2023. (JL)
|
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service Upon the U.S. Attorneys Office: (1) The United States Attorney, as attorney for respondent, shall show cause before this Court why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by filing a return to the petition; (2) by Tuesday, September 5, 2023, the United States Attorney shall serve a copy of their return on the petitioner herein and shall file the original thereof, with proof of service, with the Clerk of the Court; and (3) Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the return and serve a copy on the respondents. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 7/6/2023. (JL)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (CL) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Document /Leave to Proceed Anonymously by S. J.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Proceed Anonymously, #2 Proposed Order) (Schwartzberg, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew D. Emrich, Ted H. Kim, John Lafferty, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patricia A. Menges, New York Asylum Office, USCIS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Ur M. Jaddou filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16849864, filed by S. J.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Index of Exhibits, #4 Exhibit A - Affirmative Asylum Interview Scheduling _ USCIS (2022.05.31), #5 Exhibit B - Davidson Declaration E.D.N.Y. 19-cv-06457, #6 Exhibit C - Quarterly All Forms FY2023 Q1, #7 Exhibit D - 2020 CIS Ombudsman Annual Report- part 1, #8 Exhibit D - 2020 CIS Ombudsman Annual Report- part 2, #9 Exhibit E- 2022 CIS Ombudsman Annual Report, #10 Exhibit F - Asylum Statistics for January 2019, #11 Exhibit G - Asylum Statistics for March 2019, #12 Exhibit H - 2021 USCIS Statistical Annual Report, #13 Exhibit I - Quarterly All Forms FY2022 Q1, #14 Exhibit J - Asylum Division Quarterly StatsFY22Q4 I589 Stats revised I589 FilingCompletionPending, #15 Exhibit K - USCIS Script and Talking Points - Asylum Quarterly (2022.12.13), #16 Exhibit L - 2021 HRF Report - Protection Postponed, #17 Exhibit M - AILA Practice Advisory USCIS Scheduling, #18 Exhibit N - USCIS Response to the CIS Ombudsman 2022 Annual Report (2023.05.05), #19 Exhibit O - Ctr. for Migration Studies of NY, How-the-Asylum-Backlog) (Schwartzberg, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
