Certicable Inc. v. Point 2 Point Communications Corporation
| Certicable Inc and Certicable Inc. |
| Point 2 Point Communications Corporation |
| 2:2023cv05322 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Steven I Locke |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/28/2023. (KD)
|
|
ORDER re #9 : The amended complaint filed as Doc. #7 is deemed withdrawn.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 7/28/2023. c/ecf (RI)
|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for corrected amended complaint served on Point 2 Point Communications Corp. on 07/27/2023, filed by Certicable Inc.. (Feldman, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION to Withdraw Entry Number 7 by Certicable Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion Notice of Motion to Withdraw) (Feldman, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT Corrected against Point 2 Point Communications Corporation, filed by Certicable Inc.. (Feldman, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Point 2 Point Communications Corporation, filed by Certicable Inc.. (Feldman, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for complaint served on Point 2 Point Communications Corp. on 07/14/2023, filed by Certicable Inc.. (Feldman, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Point 2 Point Communications Corporation. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (LJ) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Point 2 Point Communications Corporation filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16885661 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Certicable Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Feldman, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
