Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Sumrick Builders, Inc.
| Arch Specialty Insurance Company |
| Sumrick Builders, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv05535 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| James M Wicks |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference via Zoom will be held October 10, 2023 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than October 3, 2023. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. This conference is a public proceeding, and all are welcome to attend via telephone or via video. If you would like to receive the Zoom invitation, please contact Judge Wicks' Courtroom Deputy at (631) 712-5625. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Practice Rules) (DF)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sumrick Builders, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Proof of Service) (Knab, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. Sumrick Builders, Inc. served on 7/26/2023, answer due 8/16/2023. (Vilenchik, Vitaly) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Sumrick Builders, Inc.. (CL) |
| Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (CL) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Vilenchik, Vitaly) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Arch Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Arch Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Arch Reinsurance Company, Corporate Parent Arch Capital Group, Ltd. for Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Vilenchik, Vitaly) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Vilenchik, Vitaly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sumrick Builders, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16916932 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Arch Specialty Insurance Company. (Vilenchik, Vitaly) |
| Notice: Incomplete Case/Document/Entry Information. Please file using the correct event the: Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, and pay the Civil Filing Fee for the following case for processing. This event may be found under-Initial Pleadings and Service Complaints and Other Initiating Documents (SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Sumrick Builders, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arch Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Vitaly Vilenchik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sumrick Builders, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Knab |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
