Singh et al v. Patel et al
| Noddy Singh, Arjun Singh individually and as shareholders of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice and Pan King, Inc. |
| Pratik Patel individually and as a shareholder of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice and Lalit Patel |
| 2:2023cv05626 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Arjun Singh, Noddy Singh (Walia, Bobby) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. #7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/7/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Motion for additional time by Arjun Singh, Noddy Singh (Walia, Bobby) |
| Filing 5 Letter per Order Hon. Gonzalez by Arjun Singh, Noddy Singh (Walia, Bobby) |
|
ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time. See ECF No. #6 . Plaintiffs shall file on or before August 17, 2023, the letter required by the Court's prior order addressing whether Plaintiffs' claims in this case should be dismissed as duplicative of the parties' earlier-filed, related case. Defendants shall file their responsive letter on or before August 24, 2023. The Court warns Plaintiffs that further extensions of this deadline are unlikely and that, if Plaintiffs fail to submit the letter required by this order by August 17, 2023, the Court will likely take under consideration whether to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims in this case without affording Plaintiffs an opportunity further to brief the issue. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/28/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (LJ) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiffs who commenced this lawsuit are the defendants in a previously-filed lawsuit pending before the Court (No. 21-cv-759), involving exactly the same parties that also arises from the same business that the parties previously operated together. In that case, the Court denied the defendants' motion to amend their answer to assert new counterclaims, after hearing argument on the motion on May 18, 2023. Now, however, those same defendants, acting as Plaintiffs in this case, appear to be asserting essentially the same claims in their complaint. Plaintiffs shall file a letter no longer than five pages on or before August 3, 2023, explaining why this case should not be dismissed as duplicative of the parties' related case since the Second Circuit has explained that a party "who is unhappy with a district court's denial of" a motion to amend a pleading does not have "an unfettered right to bring a new action against that very defendant, effectively neutralizing the district court's ruling on the motion to amend." Wang v. Ren, No. 20-4216-cv, 2023 WL 1977233, at *2 (2d Cir. Feb. 14, 2023) (affirming dismissal of second-filed lawsuit as duplicative). Defendants shall file a responsive letter no longer than five pages on or before August 8, 2023.The Court will likely take under consideration whether to dismiss this case as duplicative of the parties' previously-filed case based solely on the parties' letters, without affording the parties an opportunity further to brief the issue, regardless of whether Plaintiffs and Defendants each file their respective letters required by this order.Plaintiffs' counsel shall inform the attorneys representing Defendants in the parties' previously-filed case of the commencement of this case and this order, in writing, no later than July 28, 2023, and Plaintiffs shall file a letter on this docket no later than July 31, 2023, confirming that they have done so. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 7/27/2023. (BH)
|
| A summons was not issued for one of the following reason: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Complaint was entered as against plaintiffs; entry was deleted and re-entered as against defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Noddy Singh, Pan King, Inc., Arjun Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Agreement, #2 Exhibit Pan King, Inc - Minutes, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (LJ) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16929803 (LJ) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/27/2023: #1 Additional Corrections) (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
