Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. Aqua Systems, Inc., et al
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company |
| Aqua Systems, Inc.,, Murtuza Tofafarosh and Does 1 through 20 |
| 2:2023cv05640 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| James M Wicks |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Aqua Systems, Inc.,, Murtuza Tofafarosh. (IH) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Aqua Systems, Inc.,, Murtuza Tofafarosh. (IH) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, Quality Control Check - Summons, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, Quality Control Check - Summons, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No name and address on the To Section and the Plaintiffs attorney name and addresses section., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (IH) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (CL) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12- We have a new clerk of the court. It is no longer Douglas C. Palmer. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (CL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aqua Systems, Inc.,, Murtuza Tofafarosh filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16931848 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - YES ,, filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Aqua Systems, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons to Murtuza Tofafarosh, #4 Exhibit A to K) (Feuchtbaum, Louis) Modified on 7/27/2023 (CL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
