Lawal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Elizabeth Miller |
| 2:2023cv06797 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nusrat Jahan Choudhury |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-17226610 by Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit in Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint and all claims therein are remanded to USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(b), without costs, expenses, or attorney's fees to any party; that remand is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reinstate this action if USCIS does not render a decision on Plaintiff's Application for Naturalization (form N-400) within sixty (60) days of the Stipulation and Order of Remand being so-ordered by the Court; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 10/27/2023. (JT) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 motion to remand with leave to reinstate this action pursuant to the attached stipulation. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 10/25/2023. (DE)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Remand to Agency to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , Stipulation and Proposed Order Submitted for the Court's Endorsement by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Elizabeth Miller, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Price, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of All Defendants (notification declined or already on case) (Price, Thomas) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Nusrat Jahan Choudhury. Judge Gary R. Brown no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Re-docketed to correct statistical error) (KA) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Russell Price on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Price, Thomas) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Nusrat Jahan Choudhury. Judge Gary R. Brown no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KA) |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information: Original DE 8 (NOTICE of Appearance by Toniann Territola on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Territola, Toniann)) was deleted. No notice of appearance by this attorney should have been filed in this case, as the attorney does not represent any plaintiff or defendant in this matter. (JC) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Paul M. Davis, MOTION to Substitute Attorney Michael Samuel by Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Affidavit of Attorney Paul M. Davis) (Davis, Paul) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Samuel on behalf of Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal (aty to be noticed) (Samuel, Michael) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 9/18/2023, answer due 11/17/2023; Elizabeth Miller served on 9/18/2023, answer due 11/17/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 9/18/2023, answer due 11/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified mail receipts) (Davis, Paul) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (CL) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (CL) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (CL) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal (Davis, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Elizabeth Miller, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17078924 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Adeniyi Yussuf Lawal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
