Quilisadio v. NYP Holdings, Inc. et al
| JAMIE QUILISADIO |
| NYP HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a NEW YORK POST, DEIRDRE BARDOLF, John Ray, JOHN RAY & ASSOCIATES and NYP Holdings, Inc. doing business as New York Post |
| 2:2023cv07063 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated as per plaintiff's #16 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (PW) |
ORDER GRANTING #18 . Mr. Ray may move for sanctions under Rule 11 if he is so inclined. However, to the extent he suggests that plaintiff's filing of his Rule 41(a)(1) notice was or should be deemed to be with prejudice, that is not happening. Plaintiff had an absolute right to dismiss the action without prejudice prior to the filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Moreover, Mr. Ray should determine whether a Rule 11 motion is worth it, as the only violation evident from the pleading was the jurisdictional allegation. If Mr. Ray spends more time seeking Rule 11 sanctions for that than he did in observing that the complaint had improperly pled subject matter jurisdiction, it's unlikely he will be awarded the full amount. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/17/2023. (PW)
|
| Filing 18 Letter MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 by John Ray & Associates, John Ray. (Ray, John) |
| Filing 17 Letter by Jamie Quilisadio (Cassar, Christopher) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jamie Quilisadio (Cassar, Christopher) |
| Filing 15 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Document : Motion to Dismiss by Deirdre Bardolf, NYP Holdings, Inc.. (Everdell, Abigail) |
|
ORDER granting #15 and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. NYP may file its motion to dismiss on 10/18/23. However, having reviewed the complaint, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE BY 10/13/23 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as the allegations in the complaint appear to preclude diversity jurisdiction. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/6/2023. (PW)
|
| Filing 14 Letter by John Ray & Associates, John Ray (Ray, John) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by John W. Ray on behalf of John Ray & Associates, John Ray (aty to be noticed) (Ray, John) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NYP Holdings, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent News Corporation for NYP Holdings, Inc.. (Everdell, Abigail) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Abigail Bain Everdell on behalf of NYP Holdings, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Everdell, Abigail) |
|
ORDER re: #14 Letter. No premotion conference is necessary. Defendant may file his motion to dismiss by 10/18/2023. In addition, counsel is advised that any letter filed in this action must include in the ECF entry line a brief description of the subject matter of the letter, e.g., "Letter request for premotion conference to file a motion to dismiss," not simply, "Letter", so that the docket remains intelligible. Furthermore, this letter should have been designated as an ECF event Letter "Motion" since it seeks relief from the Court. Do not refile. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/3/2023. (PW)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamie Quilisadio. John Ray & Associates served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (Cassar, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamie Quilisadio. John Ray served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (Cassar, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamie Quilisadio. NYP Holdings, Inc. served on 9/25/2023, answer due 10/16/2023. (Cassar, Christopher) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 11/7/2023 at 10:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 642046966#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/26/2023. (PW)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Incorrect Document/Entry Information. Document 5 was removed because it should not have been entered in this case. (BBM) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jamie Quilisadio (Cassar, Christopher) Modified on 9/25/2023 (LJ). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Jamie Quilisadio (Cassar, Christopher) Modified on 9/25/2023 (LJ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17111644 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Jamie Quilisadio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cassar, Christopher) Modified on 9/25/2023 (LJ). |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. A completed Civil Cover Sheet was not filed - specifically page 2 of the document - please complete all applicable questions under the NY-E Division of Business Rule 1(c). Question 2 (a) and (b) need to be answered. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
