Associated Materials, LLC v. Alside Construction, Inc.
| Associated Materials, LLC |
| Alside Construction, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv07346 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven I Locke |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Electronic ORDER granting DE #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. On consent, the deadline for Defendant to answer or other respond to the Complaint is extended, nunc pro tunc, to and including 2/1/2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 11/22/2023. (JM)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 1, 2024 by Alside Construction, Inc.. (Riger, Lee) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee Evan Riger on behalf of Alside Construction, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Riger, Lee) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Associated Materials, LLC. Alside Construction, Inc. served on 10/12/2023, answer due 11/2/2023. (Lavine, Jordan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Alside Construction, Inc. (LJ) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A _NY Department of State, #3 Exhibit B_Printout of Plaintiffs Business, #4 Exhibit C_Printout of Plaintiff's Use of Trademark, #5 Exhibit D_Printout of Plaintiff's Trademark Registrations, #6 Exhibit E_Printout from Defendant's Website, #7 Exhibit F_Printout from Defendant's Website, #8 Exhibit G_Printout from Defendant's Website, #9 Exhibit H_Printout of Defendant's FB and Instagram Pages, #10 Exhibit I_2023-07-21_Correspondence to Defendant, #11 Exhibit J_2023-08-01_Follow-up email to Defendant, #12 Exhibit K_2023-09-15_Follow-up email to Defendant) (LJ) |
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Associated Materials, LLC (Lavine, Jordan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alside Construction, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17140205 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Associated Materials, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A _NY Department of State, #4 Exhibit B_Printout of Plaintiffs Business, #5 Exhibit C_Printout of Plaintiff's Use of Trademark, #6 Exhibit D_Printout of Plaintiff's Trademark Registrations, #7 Exhibit E_Printout from Defendant's Website, #8 Exhibit F_Printout from Defendant's Website, #9 Exhibit G_Printout from Defendant's Website, #10 Exhibit H_Printout of Defendant's FB and Instagram Pages, #11 Exhibit I_2023-07-21_Correspondence to Defendant, #12 Exhibit J_2023-08-01_Follow-up email to Defendant, #13 Exhibit K_2023-09-15_Follow-up email to Defendant) (Lavine, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Associated Materials, LLC v. Alside Construction, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Associated Materials, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jordan Lavine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alside Construction, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lee Evan Riger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
