Prendergast v. United Site Services Northeast, Inc. et al
Sandra Prendergast |
United Site Services Northeast, Inc. and Paul R. Wachter |
2:2023cv08273 |
November 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
James M Wicks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Tomari on behalf of United Site Services Northeast, Inc., Paul R. Wachter (notification declined or already on case) (Tomari, Anthony) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer on January 8, 2024 by United Site Services Northeast, Inc., Paul R. Wachter. (Tomari, Anthony) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Prendergast. United Site Services Northeast, Inc. served on 11/29/2023, answer due 12/20/2023. (Romero, Peter) |
NOTICE: This case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Court's Direct Assignment Pilot Program, which is governed by Administrative Order 2023-23. The Administrative Order, answers to Frequently Asked Questions about the Pilot Program, information about consenting to a Magistrate Judge, and a biography of the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case are on the Courts website: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program (DF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sara Virginia Messina on behalf of Sandra Prendergast (aty to be noticed) (Messina, Sara) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (CL) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (CL) |
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (CL) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Site Services Northeast, Inc., Paul R. Wachter filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-17260555 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Sandra Prendergast. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Romero, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.