AutoExpo Ent. Inc. et al v. Elyahou et al
| AutoExpo Ent. Inc., Peace Properties LLC, Network Reinsurance Company Inc., Auto Exchange Center, LLC and Chrome Insurance Agency LLC |
| Omid Elyahou, SimpSocial LLC, Fifty Seven Consulting Corp. d/b/a Certified Auto Group a/k/a Certified Performance Motors, Avi Eitan and Fazeeda Kassim |
| 2:2023cv09249 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Auto Exchange Center, LLC, AutoExpo Ent. Inc., Chrome Insurance Agency LLC, Network Reinsurance Company Inc., Peace Properties LLC (Kataev, Emanuel) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Auto Exchange Center, LLC, AutoExpo Ent. Inc., Chrome Insurance Agency LLC, Network Reinsurance Company Inc., Peace Properties LLC (Kataev, Emanuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Avi Eitan, Omid Elyahou, Fifty Seven Consulting Corp. d/b/a Certified Auto Group a/k/a Certified Performance Motors, Fazeeda Kassim, SimpSocial LLC filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17389649 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Network Reinsurance Company Inc., Peace Properties LLC, Auto Exchange Center, LLC, AutoExpo Ent. Inc., Chrome Insurance Agency LLC. (Kataev, Emanuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
