Keith v. Austin Coins, Inc. et al
| Earl E Keith and Earl E. Keith |
| Austin Coins, Inc, Christian Foster, Brandon E Chancey, Eric P Lesak, David Schmidt, Christopher M. Paradise, Eric P. Lesak, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E. Chancey, Mike Todd and Patrick J. White |
| 2:2023cv09461 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lee G Dunst |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Christopher M. Paradise served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Eric P. Lesak served on 1/17/2024, answer due 2/7/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. David Schmidt served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Christian Foster served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Patrick J. White served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Brandon E. Chancey served on 1/27/2024, answer due 2/19/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Earl E. Keith. Austin Coins, Inc. served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Walsh, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Incorrect Case/Document Entry Information. Added missing Defendant Patrick J. White to the case to conform to the Complaint. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet) and re-entered as against all Defendants. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Earl E. Keith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LJ) |
| FILING FEE: $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17406143 (LJ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Earl E Keith (Walsh, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
