Scelza v. Department of Suffolk County Corrections et al
| Michael John Scelza |
| Department of Suffolk County Corrections, Shield number 318, Internal Security Worker, Medical Unit Doctor, E.S.U. Workers and Correctional Officers |
| 2:2024cv00492 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| James M Wicks |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs application to proceed IFP (DE 2) is granted. However, the complaint (DE 1) is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint in accordance with this Memorandum and Order, he shall do so within thirty (30) days from the date at the bottom of this page. Any amended complaint shall be clearly labeled Amended Complaint and shall bear the same docket number as this Memorandum and Order, 24-CV-00492(GRB)(JMW). If Plaintiff does not timely file an amended complaint, judgment shall enter without further notice and this case will be closed. The Clerk of the Court shall also mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff at his address of record and note service on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 3/21/2024. (JC)
|
|
Filing 7
Second letter from Pro Se Dept to pro se plaintiff Michael John Scelza acknowledging receipt of civil action. (LF)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter from Pro Se Dept to pro se plaintiff Michael John Scelza acknowledging receipt of civil action. (KS)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Related Cases: 23-cv-5825-GRB-JMW and 23-cv-8106-GRB-JMW The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (DC)
|
|
Filing 4
Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (DC)
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Authorization (DC)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael John Scelza. (DC)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Michael John Scelza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
