Yang v. Garland et al
| Wenqi Yang |
| Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan |
| 2:2024cv01406 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven I Locke |
| Orelia E Merchant |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Civil Case Terminated. SO Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on April 10, 2024. (JVC)
|
|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties' #6 stipulation of dismiss without prejudice is so ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 4/10/2024. (CS)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan (Speight, Melanie) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Pro Se Office to pro se plaintiff Wenqi Yang acknowledging receipt of civil action. (LF) |
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office re #1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus filed by Wenqi Yang: The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to show cause in writing, within sixty (60) days of receipt of this order, why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, and shall serve a copy of the response on Plaintiff, with proof of such service to the Clerk of this Court; Plaintiff, within thirty (30) days of receipt shall file a reply, if any, with proof of service to the Clerk of Court and serve a copy on the Defendant Service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the Complaint, shall be made by the Clerk of this Court via Electronic Case Filing (ECF) to the United States Attorney and by mailing a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Show Cause Response due by 5/6/2024. Ordered by Judge Orelia E. Merchant on 3/5/2024. (CS)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie M. Speight on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Speight, Melanie) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Orelia E. Merchant. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AC) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan. (GO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Wenqi Yang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (DC) Modified on 3/14/2024 (DC). |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (DC) |
| FILING FEE: $ 405.00, receipt number 200003112 (DC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
