Faublas v. Target Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Fritz Faublas
Defendant: Target Corporation (D/B/A Target Stores), Dayton Hudson Corp. and Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores
Case Number: 2:2024cv01603
Filed: March 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lee G Dunst
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Filing 6 Proposed Scheduling Order by Dayton Hudson Corp., Target Corporation (Leibowitz, Allison)
April 19, 2024 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: The Initial Conference scheduled for 5/2/2024 at 3:00PM will be held via Zoom. The Court will email a Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. This Zoom conference will be a public proceeding; nonparties are welcome to attend via telephone. To receive a telephone invitation, nonparties may contact Judge Dunst's Chambers at (631) 712-5760.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 4/19/2024. (CT)
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court will hold an Initial Conference on 5/2/2024 at 3:00PM in Courtroom 830 of the Alfonse M. D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Central Islip. The parties are directed to follow Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website, and submit a proposed discovery plan/scheduling order at least five business days prior to the initial conference pursuant to Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 3/6/2024. (CT)
March 5, 2024 Filing 5 Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: #https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (LJ)
March 5, 2024 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ)
March 5, 2024 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Fritz Faublas (Kouroupas, John)
March 5, 2024 Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ)
March 4, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dayton Hudson Corp., Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Leibowitz, Allison)
March 4, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dayton Hudson Corp., Target Corporation from Supreme Court, Nassau County, case number 607031/2023. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-17628977) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - S&C, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Response to Defendant's Demand for Damages & Plaintiff's Verified Bill of Particulars, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service) (Leibowitz, Allison) Modified on 3/5/2024 (LJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faublas v. Target Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fritz Faublas
Represented By: Joshua N. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation (D/B/A Target Stores)
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dayton Hudson Corp.
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?