Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C. v. United HealthCare Group et al
Plaintiff: Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C.
Defendant: John Doe 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5 and United HealthCare Group doing business as United Healthcare
Case Number: 2:2024cv05671
Filed: August 14, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Nusrat Jahan Choudhury
Referring Judge: James M Wicks
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2024 Filing 11 Proposed Scheduling Order by United HealthCare Group (Mazzola, Matthew)
October 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. The Court has reviewed Defendants' letter requesting a pre-motion conference on an anticipated motion to dismiss the Complaint, ECF No. #8 , and Plaintiff's response, ECF No. #9 . The Court finds that a pre-motion conference is not necessary at this time and waives the pre-motion conference requirement. The parties shall comply with the attached briefing schedule. The parties are directed to consult with the Court's Individual Rules, including the Court's recommended bundling practice. See Individual Rule 5.2. Consequently, all briefing shall be filed with the Court no later than November 27, 2024. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 10/2/2024. (ASB)
September 30, 2024 Filing 9 Letter - Response to Pre-Motion Conference by Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C. (Doshi, Amish)
September 24, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER. The Court has received Defendants' request to file an anticipated motion to dismiss, ECF No. #8 . Plaintiff shall file a reply by October 1, 2024. Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 9/24/2024. (ASB)
September 23, 2024 Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, : Defendant's Anticipated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by United HealthCare Group. (Mazzola, Matthew)
September 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference via Zoom will be held October 17, 2024 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than October 10, 2024. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. This conference is a public proceeding, and all are welcome to attend via telephone or via video. If you would like to receive the Zoom invitation, please contact Judge Wicks' Courtroom Deputy at (631) 712-5625. Parties shall comply with Judge Wicks' Individual Rules regarding Expectations for Remote Appearances (Rule 1E). THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Practice Rules) (DF)
September 13, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant United Healthcare Group d/b/a United Healthcare is directed to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before September 23, 2024. The parties are reminded that pursuant to the Hon. Nusrat J. Choudhury's Individual Rules, unless the Court directs otherwise, all non-dispositive motions-- except class certification petitions and motions related or attached to dispositive motions-- are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge, including motions to extend time to serve, answer, or file amended pleadings. See Individual Rules for Civil and Criminal Cases Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury, Rule 3.1 Matters Referred to Magistrate Judges. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/13/2024. (DN)
September 12, 2024 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, on consent, by United HealthCare Group. (Mazzola, Matthew)
September 5, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C.. United HealthCare Group served on 8/26/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. (Doshi, Amish)
August 16, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United HealthCare Group. (LJ)
August 16, 2024 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ)
August 16, 2024 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ)
August 16, 2024 Case Assigned to Judge Nusrat Jahan Choudhury and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ)
August 14, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18176844 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Doshi, Amish)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C. v. United HealthCare Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Kripalani M.D. P.C.
Represented By: Amish R. Doshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 1-5 and Jane Doe 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United HealthCare Group doing business as United Healthcare
Represented By: Matthew Paul Mazzola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?